REPORT

Contaminated Inquiry

How a University of Texas Fracking Study Led by a Gas Industry Insider Spun the Facts and Misled the Public

PAI continues to investigate fracking industry influence on academic research with this report on a University of Texas study of fracking that claimed that the drilling practice had never been linked to groundwater contamination. UT promoted the study as an independent inquiry into fracking’s environmental risks, but PAI found that the study was actually led by a gas industry insider and UT faculty member, Charles “Chip” Groat, who sits on the board of fracker Plains Exploration & Production (PXP). Groat failed to disclose this position and his $1.6 million stake in the company.

Read the full report »

PAI’s report also dissects the UT report’s industry-friendly message, showing that its central claim– that fracking does not cause groundwater contamination – relies on a highly-specific and misleading definition of fracking, that the report was released as a rough draft and not ready for public release, and that the university’s press push around the report significantly mischaracterizes and oversimplifies its findings.

Read the full report »

This is the second report in PAI’s series on the fracking industry’s influence on the academy. The first report examined the University at Buffalo Shale Resources and Society Institute May 2012 report on fracking’s environmental effects.

This entry was posted in Reports and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Contaminated Inquiry

  1. Pingback: Frackademia: noun – An academic aligned with frackers

  2. Pingback: Frackers Fund University Research That Proves Their Case | RefineryNews.com

  3. Pingback: When Agendas Meet Science in the Gas Drilling Fight - NYTimes.com

  4. Pingback: Texas Professor On the Defensive Over Fracking Money | StateImpact Texas

  5. Pingback: UT Fracking Study Comes Under Scrutinty | The Alcalde

  6. Pingback: University of Texas Promises Review of Fracking Study in Response to PAI’s Criticism | Public Accountability Initiative

  7. Pingback: Contaminated Inquiry: Prof with Money Ties to Industry Led Fracking Study | politicsandpolls-com

  8. Pingback: Contaminated Inquiry: Prof with Money Ties to Industry Led Fracking Study « Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy

  9. Pingback: Gaz de schiste : une seule image vous marque et tout est déglingué ! * | Le blog du Communicant 2.0

  10. Pingback: Contaminated Inquiry: Prof with Money Ties to Industry Led Fracking Study | Common Dreams

  11. Pingback: Un expert en gaz de schiste contaminé par l’industrie » revue du web, Just another weblog

  12. Pingback: Frackademics: The Ohio Shale Coalition Team - Eyes on the Ties

  13. Pingback: Money Ties to Industry Led Fracking Study | Frontview

  14. Pingback: When Agendas Meet Science in the Gas Drilling Fight | "Global Possibilities"

  15. Pingback: Frackademics in Frackademia

  16. Pingback: Penn State faculty refuse to co-author frackademic report - Eyes on the Ties

  17. Pingback: Frackademia: Controversial SUNY Buffalo Shale Institute’s Reputation Unraveling | News 47News 47

  18. Pingback: Ever seen these chart’s on Fox New’s or The Weather Channel how about CNN maybe CNBC followed by ok how do we make money on this? « Pulled from the wreckage of your silent reverie

  19. Pingback: Frackademia: Controversial SUNY Buffalo Shale Institute’s Reputation Unraveling | News Talk One

  20. Pingback: University of Texas reviewers blast fracking report and recommend its withdrawal | Public Accountability Initiative

  21. Pingback: Review of UT Fracking Study Finds Failure to Disclose Conflict of Interest (Updated) | StateImpact Texas

  22. Pingback: UT Accepts Recommendations From Fracking Report | The Alcalde

  23. Pingback: UT-Austin Administration Distances Itself From “Frackademia” Study | BirchIndigo

  24. Pingback: Scientist behind tainted fracking study now heading major Gulf restoration project | Stuart H. Smith

  25. Pingback: Major Pro-Fracking Studies Discredited

  26. Pingback: Hydrofracking – the Controversy Continues (also: Journalists still suck at scientific reporting) « Life in Progress

  27. Pingback: From DeSmogBlog.com: UT-Austin Administration Distances Itself from “Frackademia” Study | Coalition to Protect New York

  28. Pingback: Professor Resigns Over Conflict of Interest in Fracking Study « DarkGovernment

  29. Pingback: The Fracking Controversy | Rhode Trips

  30. Pingback: Frackademia: Controversial SUNY Buffalo Shale Institute’s Reputation Unraveling

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


× 9 = sixty three

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>